Template talk:Spell table row: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Naming == I know you have already done artifact lists with the same style, and we want to keep things simple. However, would it not be more clear to use whole words like "spel...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Naming == | == Naming == | ||
I know you have already done artifact lists with the same style, and we want to keep things simple. However, would it not be more clear to use whole words like "spell row" rather than "sr"? –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 10:30, 19 March 2014 (CET) | I know you have already done artifact lists with the same style, and we want to keep things simple. However, would it not be more clear to use whole words like "spell row" rather than "sr"? –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 10:30, 19 March 2014 (CET) | ||
:Well, I don't mind if you want to change template names to more clear versions. I myself just like compressed code to save space, since those lists has a lot of data to show in code. I made those something alike to HTML Table code <TD> <TR> ;] --[[User:HaxLi|HaxLi]] 17:34, 19 March 2014 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 16:34, 19 March 2014
Naming
I know you have already done artifact lists with the same style, and we want to keep things simple. However, would it not be more clear to use whole words like "spell row" rather than "sr"? –Kapteeni Ruoska 10:30, 19 March 2014 (CET)
- Well, I don't mind if you want to change template names to more clear versions. I myself just like compressed code to save space, since those lists has a lot of data to show in code. I made those something alike to HTML Table code ;] --HaxLi 17:34, 19 March 2014 (CET)