Talk:List of mass spells: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Armageddon: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it worth mentioning [[Armageddon]] in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell [[User:Ibraesil|Ibraesil]] ([[User talk:Ibraesil|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET) | Is it worth mentioning [[Armageddon]] in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell [[User:Ibraesil|Ibraesil]] ([[User talk:Ibraesil|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET) | ||
: I think that's a good idea. We'll want to have separate sections though. One for spells that are always cast on all troops (i.e. armageddon) and one for spells that require the respective expert magic. We'll want to move the original article summary to this section. We might also want to put subsections in this section for the different types (allies-only, enemies-only, and allies-and-enemies). | |||
: --[[user:imahero|imahero]] 08:31, 18 December 2016 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 07:31, 18 December 2016
Integration
Could we integrate this article into List of spells if we add "mass spell" column to the Template:St? –Kapteeni Ruoska 07:53, 21 March 2014 (CET)
Armageddon
Is it worth mentioning Armageddon in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell Ibraesil (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET)
- I think that's a good idea. We'll want to have separate sections though. One for spells that are always cast on all troops (i.e. armageddon) and one for spells that require the respective expert magic. We'll want to move the original article summary to this section. We might also want to put subsections in this section for the different types (allies-only, enemies-only, and allies-and-enemies).
- --imahero 08:31, 18 December 2016 (CET)