Category talk:Manuals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::: Try using the wiki's search function with: '''"manual page" archangels''' | ::: Try using the wiki's search function with: '''"manual page" archangels''' | ||
::: --[[User:imahero|imahero]] | ::: --[[User:imahero|imahero]] | ||
:::: In that case, should that search utility be mentioned on the main page or something? It sounds like it could be useful, but since not even Kapt. Ruoska or I knew of it, it seems unlikely that it would be made use of by people using the wiki [[User:Ibraesil|Ibraesil]] ([[User talk:Ibraesil|talk]]) 11:59, 6 November 2017 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 6 November 2017
Are manuals actually necessary for this wiki?
While the idea of manuals in this wiki is reasonable, I fail to see the point of having them here. In my opinnion, these manual pages are useless. I do not think anyone will read them from here, and certanly not in this form where all the pages are scattered as their own files. I suggest that we will remove the files. Any counter arguments? –Kapteeni Ruoska (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2017 (CET)
- The point is to have the text searchable in the wiki. I've painstakingly edited each one for accuracy.
- --imahero
- What do you mean by searchable? Is it somehow possible to use the wiki's search function to find words in the pages of manual? –Kapteeni Ruoska (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2017 (CET)
- Try using the wiki's search function with: "manual page" archangels
- --imahero