Talk:Golem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (→Similarities) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I think one of the differences is, that all golems are non-living, but all non-living are not golems. For exampel undead are non-living. So non-living is more a term than a creature type. And therefore I would keep them seperate articles. –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 21:54, 23 March 2014 (CET) | :I think one of the differences is, that all golems are non-living, but all non-living are not golems. For exampel undead are non-living. So non-living is more a term than a creature type. And therefore I would keep them seperate articles. –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 21:54, 23 March 2014 (CET) | ||
:Uh, I was too hasty. You meant unliving, not non-living. But, I think unliving means the same thing as non-living. –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 21:56, 23 March 2014 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 20:56, 23 March 2014
Similarities
Golem and Unliving means the same to me acording to this wiki >_<. Not sure but seems like a merge would be a good idea x] --HaxLi 13:49, 21 March 2014 (CET)
- I think one of the differences is, that all golems are non-living, but all non-living are not golems. For exampel undead are non-living. So non-living is more a term than a creature type. And therefore I would keep them seperate articles. –Kapteeni Ruoska 21:54, 23 March 2014 (CET)
- Uh, I was too hasty. You meant unliving, not non-living. But, I think unliving means the same thing as non-living. –Kapteeni Ruoska 21:56, 23 March 2014 (CET)