Template talk:Spell table row: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Naming) |
m (Kapteeni Ruoska moved page Template talk:Sr to Template talk:Spell table row: no acronyms) |
Latest revision as of 05:03, 21 October 2015
Naming[edit | hide | hide all]
I know you have already done artifact lists with the same style, and we want to keep things simple. However, would it not be more clear to use whole words like "spell row" rather than "sr"? –Kapteeni Ruoska 10:30, 19 March 2014 (CET)
- Well, I don't mind if you want to change template names to more clear versions. I myself just like compressed code to save space, since those lists has a lot of data to show in code. I made those something alike to HTML Table code ;] --HaxLi 17:34, 19 March 2014 (CET)
- I get your point, I do. This question is more a bit irrelevant, and it does not matter much wheter to write longer or shorter templates. My only consern is, that if that template is used by someone other, it is a bit unintuitive (not sure if that is a word :P). But I guess that template is for single page only, and if you do it well, no one has to use it ever again. –Kapteeni Ruoska 19:13, 19 March 2014 (CET)