Category talk:Manuals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::: Try using the wiki's search function with: '''manual page archangel''' | ::: Try using the wiki's search function with: '''manual page archangel''' | ||
::: It shows that archangel is mentioned on page 87 of the RoE manual and page 25 of the SoD manual. | ::: It shows that archangel is mentioned on page 87 of the RoE manual and page 25 of the SoD manual. | ||
::: Here it is using google: <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aheroes.thelazy.net+%22manual+page%22+ | ::: Here it is using google: <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aheroes.thelazy.net+%22manual+page%22+archangel+or+archangels "manual page" archangel or archangels]</span> | ||
::: --[[User:imahero|imahero]] | ::: --[[User:imahero|imahero]] | ||
Revision as of 17:12, 5 November 2017
Are manuals actually necessary for this wiki?
While the idea of manuals in this wiki is reasonable, I fail to see the point of having them here. In my opinnion, these manual pages are useless. I do not think anyone will read them from here, and certanly not in this form where all the pages are scattered as their own files. I suggest that we will remove the files. Any counter arguments? –Kapteeni Ruoska (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2017 (CET)
- The point is to have the text searchable in the wiki. I've painstakingly edited each one for accuracy.
- --imahero
- What do you mean by searchable? Is it somehow possible to use the wiki's search function to find words in the pages of manual? –Kapteeni Ruoska (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2017 (CET)
- Try using the wiki's search function with: manual page archangel
- It shows that archangel is mentioned on page 87 of the RoE manual and page 25 of the SoD manual.
- Here it is using google: "manual page" archangel or archangels
- --imahero