User talk:Kapteeni Ruoska: Difference between revisions

From Heroes 3 wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Your deprecation of the hero pic template has completely destroyed the [[Tarnum]] page in a way that will be hard to repair with the Hero template, for reasons specific to Tarnum. It also quite wrecked the [[Lord Haart]] layout.
Your deprecation of the hero pic template has completely destroyed the [[Tarnum]] page in a way that will be hard to repair with the Hero template, for reasons specific to Tarnum. It also quite wrecked the [[Lord Haart]] layout.


:I am well aware of this, specially in the case of Lord Haart. In the Haart's case, it would be probably wisest thing to separate the two articles, for example "Lord Haart the knight" and "Lord Haart the death knight". In some point, I will fix it somehow. However, although I am the "author" of the new hero template, I think it is much better and more informational than the old one. Perhaps I could have started a completely new template, but that did not occur to me at the time and for that I am sorry.  –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 06:36, 28 February 2014 (CET)
:True, that the heropic template wrecks the Tarnum page because of its infromation text. However, I disagree it is hard to repair. First of all, the only thing that the heropic template does is, that it sets an image on the page. This can be also be done with ordinary wikitext, and almost as easily. So in my opinnion, the Tarnum page can easily be repaired by anyone with the will. What comes to Lord Haart, I admit that the page looks awful at the moment. However, it is only partly the hero templates fault. There is definetly few ways to make the page more appealing. One of which is to separate the two articles, for example "Lord Haart the knight" and "Lord Haart the death knight". In some point, I will fix it somehow. –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 06:36, 28 February 2014 (CET) (new edit)

Revision as of 05:46, 28 February 2014

Epic timing?

Lol, did we just edit the Learning skill page the same minute? My edit was blocked and it said you had done an edit like 3s earlier. --Ooola 13:18, 17 February 2014 (CET)

I did edit learning skill. :D Funny coincidence! And sorry for the inconvenience. –Kapteeni Ruoska 13:21, 17 February 2014 (CET)

Hero pic

Your deprecation of the hero pic template has completely destroyed the Tarnum page in a way that will be hard to repair with the Hero template, for reasons specific to Tarnum. It also quite wrecked the Lord Haart layout.

True, that the heropic template wrecks the Tarnum page because of its infromation text. However, I disagree it is hard to repair. First of all, the only thing that the heropic template does is, that it sets an image on the page. This can be also be done with ordinary wikitext, and almost as easily. So in my opinnion, the Tarnum page can easily be repaired by anyone with the will. What comes to Lord Haart, I admit that the page looks awful at the moment. However, it is only partly the hero templates fault. There is definetly few ways to make the page more appealing. One of which is to separate the two articles, for example "Lord Haart the knight" and "Lord Haart the death knight". In some point, I will fix it somehow. –Kapteeni Ruoska 06:36, 28 February 2014 (CET) (new edit)