Template talk:Scenario

Prefer separate maps

• I liked the maps better when they were their own separate thing just below the scenario information. That way they could resize without affecting everything else. --Legate (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
• I hadn't actually noticed that (I was totally focused on the fact that I couldn't get the underground image to center like the aboveground one). But you're totally right, better separate to not make the text above it move around when they embiggen. –imahero 01:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Prefer __TOC__ or __NOTOC__?

Would you be ok without a table of contents on these pages? –imahero 19:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

If you do want a table of contents, where do you want it to appear? –imahero 19:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

If we do want a table of contents, do we want it squished together or spaced apart? –imahero 19:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Maybe we want it on the left side? –imahero 19:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I like having the TOC. My preference would be hugging the right side of the main scenario template (just to the right of map size/description). It may be getting too crowded up there once we add the campaign map though. --Legate (talk) 19:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I was able to make it hug the campaign navigation box. Close enough or keep trying? –imahero 19:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

That's close enough. Is it possibly to give it a little breathing room so it isn't touching? --Legate (talk) 20:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Added padding-right:1em; –imahero 20:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Perfect. --Legate (talk) 20:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Horribly squished campaign scenarios with the campaign images & TOC

View any of the HotA campaigns as an example. Can we move the TOC to below the scenario info instead of being squished between the info and the campaign nav box? 18:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Added white-space:nowrap to prevent the squished look. –imahero 18:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)