Talk:List of mass spells: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Integration == | == Integration == | ||
Could we integrate this article into [[List of spells]] if we add "mass spell" column to the [[:Template: | Could we integrate this article into [[List of spells]] if we add "mass spell" column to the [[:Template:Spell table]]? –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 07:53, 21 March 2014 (CET) | ||
: I think another column for [[List of spells]] could be helpful. Instead of '''mass spell''' I would call it '''Target''' and it would include the changes in target based on the respective level of magic. | : I think another column for [[List of spells]] could be helpful. Instead of '''mass spell''' I would call it '''Target''' and it would include the changes in target based on the respective level of magic. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Is it worth mentioning [[Armageddon]] in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell [[User:Ibraesil|Ibraesil]] ([[User talk:Ibraesil|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET) | Is it worth mentioning [[Armageddon]] in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell [[User:Ibraesil|Ibraesil]] ([[User talk:Ibraesil|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET) | ||
: I think that's a good idea. We'll want to have separate sections though. One for spells that are always cast on all troops ( | : I think that's a good idea. We'll want to have separate sections though. One for spells that are always cast on all troops (e.g. armageddon) and one for spells that require the respective expert magic. We'll want to move the original article summary to this section. We might also want to put subsections in this section for the different types (allies-only, enemies-only, and allies-and-enemies). | ||
: --[[user:imahero|imahero]] 08:31, 18 December 2016 (CET) | : --[[user:imahero|imahero]] 08:31, 18 December 2016 (CET) | ||
::In my opinnion, no. Because the logic is different, as the Armageddon is "always" a mass spell, rather than becoming one at expert level (Fire Magic). –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] ([[User talk:Kapteeni Ruoska|talk]]) 06:07, 19 December 2016 (CET) | ::In my opinnion, no. Because the logic is different, as the Armageddon is "always" a mass spell, rather than becoming one at expert level (Fire Magic). –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] ([[User talk:Kapteeni Ruoska|talk]]) 06:07, 19 December 2016 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:34, 12 April 2021
Integration[edit | hide | hide all]
Could we integrate this article into List of spells if we add "mass spell" column to the Template:Spell table? –Kapteeni Ruoska 07:53, 21 March 2014 (CET)
- I think another column for List of spells could be helpful. Instead of mass spell I would call it Target and it would include the changes in target based on the respective level of magic.
- --imahero 08:39, 18 December 2016 (CET)
Armageddon[edit | hide]
Is it worth mentioning Armageddon in this article? You could argue that it's a kind of a mass spell Ibraesil (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2016 (CET)
- I think that's a good idea. We'll want to have separate sections though. One for spells that are always cast on all troops (e.g. armageddon) and one for spells that require the respective expert magic. We'll want to move the original article summary to this section. We might also want to put subsections in this section for the different types (allies-only, enemies-only, and allies-and-enemies).
- --imahero 08:31, 18 December 2016 (CET)
- In my opinnion, no. Because the logic is different, as the Armageddon is "always" a mass spell, rather than becoming one at expert level (Fire Magic). –Kapteeni Ruoska (talk) 06:07, 19 December 2016 (CET)