User talk:HaxLi: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (missspell) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Creature articles – together or separately? == | == Creature articles – together or separately? == | ||
Perhaps the first thing I did for this wiki was to unite basic and upgraded creature articles. For example, Pikeman and Halberdier became Pikeman/Halberdier, then Pikeman and halberdier and finally I am moving them to Pikeman and Halberdier. Now, I've begun to wonder if the merging was a good idea afterall. Of course there are some pros and cons in both choices. For example, one often needs the infromation about same level creatures simultaneously (IMO). But now with all the comparison options, like [[Castle | Perhaps the first thing I did for this wiki was to unite basic and upgraded creature articles. For example, Pikeman and Halberdier became Pikeman/Halberdier, then Pikeman and halberdier and finally I am moving them to Pikeman and Halberdier. Now, I've begun to wonder if the merging was a good idea afterall. Of course there are some pros and cons in both choices. For example, one often needs the infromation about same level creatures simultaneously (IMO). But now with all the comparison options, like [[Castle creatures]] or [[List of creatures]], I think that feature has become somewhat useless. The needed information can be found elsewhere if not from the combined creature page. What do you think? Should we sparate those articles again? –[[User:Kapteeni Ruoska|Kapteeni Ruoska]] 10:57, 28 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 28 March 2014
About templates
I am not sure, and I am sure you know more about templates than me, but could your problems with artifact templates be solved with Template: Empty? I am not entirely sure where would I need one, but I already created one. :) –Kapteeni Ruoska 16:53, 5 March 2014 (CET)
- Well, I'm learning everything now from the given Help:Contents here and searching by Google if can't find simple answer xD But sadly cant find fast answer with empty link tags like this [[ ]], have to put atleast one simbol to let it show the code correctly --HaxLi 17:04, 5 March 2014 (CET)
Comment about creature costs
There are probably more mistakses like the costs of Skeleton and Skeleton Warrior. As I can remember, there has been only few changes in the creature characteristics over the years from 3DO. One of the best has been the additional gems for Angels. –Kapteeni Ruoska 10:21, 21 March 2014 (CET)
Creature articles – together or separately?
Perhaps the first thing I did for this wiki was to unite basic and upgraded creature articles. For example, Pikeman and Halberdier became Pikeman/Halberdier, then Pikeman and halberdier and finally I am moving them to Pikeman and Halberdier. Now, I've begun to wonder if the merging was a good idea afterall. Of course there are some pros and cons in both choices. For example, one often needs the infromation about same level creatures simultaneously (IMO). But now with all the comparison options, like Castle creatures or List of creatures, I think that feature has become somewhat useless. The needed information can be found elsewhere if not from the combined creature page. What do you think? Should we sparate those articles again? –Kapteeni Ruoska 10:57, 28 March 2014 (CET)