Talk:Poisonous: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (typo) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does it stack with itself? [[User:Gem|Gem]] 11:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC) | Does it stack with itself? [[User:Gem|Gem]] 11:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I don't believe so; either the unit is poisoned, or it isn't. From what I recall, subsequent attacks from a poisonous creature simply do damage; no double-poisoning occurs. [[User:Memetics|Memetics]] 02:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | :I don't believe so; either the unit is poisoned, or it isn't. From what I recall, subsequent attacks from a poisonous creature simply do damage; no double-poisoning occurs. [[User:Memetics|Memetics]] 02:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, I did some tests... apparently subsequent poisoning can occur, but it resets the effect, so victim will restore its full health before losing it again. Which means no further reduction than | ::Ah, I did some tests... apparently subsequent poisoning can occur, but it resets the effect, so victim will restore its full health before losing it again. Which means no further reduction than 60%. Sadly, because [[Wyvern Monarch|Wyvern Monarchs]] could use some love... [[User:Gem|Gem]] 09:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:24, 6 November 2012
Stacking
Does it stack with itself? Gem 11:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't believe so; either the unit is poisoned, or it isn't. From what I recall, subsequent attacks from a poisonous creature simply do damage; no double-poisoning occurs. Memetics 02:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, I did some tests... apparently subsequent poisoning can occur, but it resets the effect, so victim will restore its full health before losing it again. Which means no further reduction than 60%. Sadly, because Wyvern Monarchs could use some love... Gem 09:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)