Talk:Golem

Similarities

Golem and Unliving means the same to me acording to this wiki >_<. Not sure but seems like a merge would be a good idea x] --HaxLi 13:49, 21 March 2014 (CET)

I think one of the differences is, that all golems are non-living, but all non-living are not golems. For exampel undead are non-living. So non-living is more a term than a creature type. And therefore I would keep them seperate articles. –Kapteeni Ruoska 21:54, 23 March 2014 (CET)

Uh, I was too hasty. You meant unliving, not non-living. But, I think unliving means the same thing as non-living. –Kapteeni Ruoska 21:56, 23 March 2014 (CET)

Well in List of creatures there are creatures who are called Unlivings as speciality, that's why I am confused x] Found an old Non-living article.. but it has the same info, exep there were no Undeads mentioned, but I guess they mach there --HaxLi 22:01, 23 March 2014 (CET)

As I said, I think it is mostly about definition. I mean the immunities may be very similar or even the same. I am a bit confused about this conversation, so I will say that IMO, we should have Non-living and Unliving articles combined, and separated from Golem article. –Kapteeni Ruoska 22:04, 23 March 2014 (CET)

Creatures

Not sure, but maybe I merged  Stone Gargoyle,  Obsidian Gargoyle and  Crystal Dragon incorrectly, but should we move those to a Non-living category then? This is so confusing x] --HaxLi 00:04, 24 March 2014 (CET)

I would say yes, though I am not totally sure. Because technically Stone Gargoyle is not a golem, but it is Unliving/Non-living. BTW, which is the term the game uses? –Kapteeni Ruoska 08:39, 24 March 2014 (CET)