Talk:Dispel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Anti-Magic == | == Anti-Magic == | ||
I don't think it is worth having a "Only affected by Dispel section as this could include many spells (e.g. [[Slayer]]). There was also some info about basic dispel not working on Anti-Magic...did you double-check this or was it removed by mistake? If it was a mistake, it should also be re-added to the [[Anti-Magic]] page. --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) 13:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC) | I don't think it is worth having a "Only affected by Dispel" section as this could include many spells (e.g. [[Slayer]]). There was also some info about basic dispel not working on Anti-Magic...did you double-check this or was it removed by mistake? If it was a mistake, it should also be re-added to the [[Anti-Magic]] page. --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) 13:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
* "Only affected by Dispel" section is my bad, I will remove it. However, Anti-Magic can be dispeled with basic dispel. If you cast Anti-Magic on your own troops, then you are able to use basic dispel to remove it for some reason like resurrection. --[[User:Sanust|Sanust]] ([[User talk:Sanust|talk]]) 13:45, 28 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:45, 28 August 2025
Anti-Magic
I don't think it is worth having a "Only affected by Dispel" section as this could include many spells (e.g. Slayer). There was also some info about basic dispel not working on Anti-Magic...did you double-check this or was it removed by mistake? If it was a mistake, it should also be re-added to the Anti-Magic page. --Legate (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)